Intermittent fasting is an consuming sample the place you alternate between intervals of consuming and forgoing meals.
If that sounds silly, uncomfortable, or unhealthy, I perceive—I believed the identical factor once I first heard about it years in the past.
It shocked me to be taught, nonetheless, that intermittent fasting might be an efficient device for enhancing dietary compliance. It has good science on its facet, too, and it doesn’t need to be disagreeable.
In truth, many individuals, together with hundreds of those that’ve gotten superb outcomes utilizing my books and physique transformation teaching service, get pleasure from intermittent fasting greater than conventional “weight-reduction plan,” as a result of it permits them to have fewer, bigger meals.
That mentioned, intermittent fasting isn’t some mystical key to optimum health and well being. It gained’t effortlessly rework your physique, evaporate stomach fats, or halt the ageing course of.
What it could actually do is make your weight loss plan simpler to observe and improve your long-term outcomes in case you get pleasure from it.
That’s why it’s best to perceive what it’s, the way it works, and tips on how to use it, which is precisely what you’ll be taught on this article.
What Is Intermittent Fasting (IF)?
Intermittent fasting (or “IF”) is an consuming sample the place you alternate between intervals of consuming and fasting.
Whereas folks usually confer with intermittent fasting as a “weight loss plan,” it’s not fully correct to take action.
IF protocols normally don’t specify what number of calories it’s best to eat or the stability of macronutrients and sorts of meals it’s best to devour. As an alternative, they restrict when you’ll be able to eat, therefore why calling it an “consuming sample” is extra becoming.
Intermittent fasting has gained reputation within the well being and health area as a result of many consider it has vital well being advantages, together with weight reduction, improved metabolic well being, and probably elevated longevity.
How Does Fasting Work?
In a normal sense, a “quick” is a interval throughout which you abstain from consuming (and generally ingesting), usually for non secular causes.
Within the context of health, fasting isn’t nearly not consuming—it’s about how your physique processes and absorbs meals.
Whenever you eat, your physique breaks down the meals into numerous molecules that enter your bloodstream. The hormone insulin then shuttles these molecules into cells.
When your physique is digesting and absorbing what you’ve eaten, and insulin ranges are nonetheless excessive, your physique is in a fed or postprandial state (“prandial” means having to do with a meal).
As soon as your physique finishes processing and absorbing the vitamins, insulin ranges drop to a minimal (baseline) stage, and your physique enters a “fasted” or postabsorptive state.
The time it takes to achieve this fasted state depends on the scale and composition of your meal, however typically, you gained’t be really “fasting” till you haven’t consumed something containing energy for not less than six hours.
Standard Intermittent Fasting Protocols
There are numerous approaches to intermittent fasting, however all contain biking between intervals of consuming and never consuming.
In the course of the fasting phases, you devour minimal or no meals, although you’ll be able to drink calorie-free drinks (water, natural tea, or black espresso, for instance).
The next are probably the most well-known IF strategies:
The 16/8 Methodology
The 16/8 methodology is an intermittent fasting protocol the place you quick for 16 hours per day and eat in an 8-hour window.
For most individuals, this implies skipping breakfast and consuming between lunch and dinner. For instance, you would possibly end your dinner at 8 p.m., then not eat once more till 12 p.m. the next day. Right here’s how this might look throughout every week:
A noteworthy variation of the 16/8 protocol is Martin Berkhan’s “Leangains” methodology.
Just like the 16/8 method, the Leangains methodology has you consuming your whole energy in an 8-hour window and fasting for 16 hours every day.
The distinction is that the Leangains methodology consists of extra particular tips about macronutrient targets and meal timing (notably round exercises) to maximise muscle achieve.
Particularly, Leangains recommends the next:
- Exercise Timing: Leangains suggests figuring out fasted, normally close to the top of your quick, adopted by the most important meal of the day.
- Greater Protein: To maximise muscle development, you eat a high-protein diet whereas following Leangains.
- Macronutrient Biking: On Leangains you eat extra carbs and energy on exercise days versus relaxation days.
Based mostly on my expertise of serving to hundreds of individuals attain their well being and health targets and my very own dalliances with fasting, I’ve discovered the 16/8 (or Leangains) methodology to be probably the most sensible fasting protocol for constructing muscle and dropping fats.
The Warrior Food regimen
Ori Hofmekler popularized the Warrior Food regimen in his ebook of the identical identify.
It entails consuming one massive night meal in a 4-hour feeding window after which “fasting” for the remaining 20 hours every day.
I say “fasting” since you’re allowed to eat a couple of small snacks of protein, fruit, and/or veggies all through the day, which can elevate insulin ranges and break the fasted state.
Right here’s how this appears throughout every week:
Moreover, Hofmekler says it’s best to begin your massive meal by consuming greens, after which transfer to protein, after which fat. Should you’re nonetheless hungry after consuming fats, you’ll be able to eat carbs.
The sensible good thing about that is calorie management—you’re much less more likely to overeat this manner versus beginning your meal with a swan dive right into a bowl of scrumptious carbs.
Usually talking, I’m not a fan of the Warrior Food regimen.
Whereas it could actually work for folks who solely prefer to eat once per day, most individuals discover that it makes coaching tough, managing starvation difficult, and consuming sufficient protein to maximise muscle development virtually not possible.
The 16/8 or Leangains methodology is sort of at all times superior.
Alternate-Day Fasting
Alternate-Day Fasting (ADF) has you alternate between days of “regular” consuming and “fasting.”
(Since every week has an odd variety of days, alternating completely isn’t attainable. Subsequently, most individuals quick for 3 days and eat usually for 4 days every week.)
On “regular” days, you eat kind of the quantity of vitality you burn (TDEE). On “fasting” days, you eat 20-to-25% of this quantity (round 500 energy for most individuals).
Right here’s the way it would possibly look throughout every week:
From my expertise, ADF is just appropriate for very obese sedentary folks. When match, energetic people strive it, their exercises normally undergo, which makes constructing muscle more difficult.
The 5:2 Food regimen
The 5:2 diet is much like alternate-day fasting, solely as a substitute of fasting on 3 non-consecutive days per week, you quick on 2 non-consecutive days per week.
In your fasting days, you’ll be able to eat a most of 500 energy in case you’re a girl, and 600 energy in case you’re a person.
Right here’s an instance of tips on how to schedule it:
The 5:2 weight loss plan can work for folks with loads of weight to lose, however it could actually make coaching and consuming a high-protein weight loss plan more durable, so it’s not ultimate if you wish to maximize muscle development.
Eat Cease Eat
Eat Cease Eat is an intermittent fasting protocol created by Brad Pilon.
Whereas following Eat Cease Eat:
- You quick for twenty-four hours a few times per week on non-consecutive days.
- You can begin your fasts while you like, however they have to go for twenty-four hours. As an example, you could possibly cease consuming after your dinner one night, then not eat once more till the identical time the next day. Or, if it fits your schedule higher, you could possibly end your snack one afternoon, then quick till the identical time the next afternoon.
Right here’s how the Eat Cease Eat protocol appears for most individuals:
In contrast to with a lot of the different fashionable fasting protocols that contain not consuming for lengthy intervals, you’ll be able to’t have any meals throughout your fasting intervals on Eat Cease Eat.
Due to this, the Eat Cease Eat methodology might be powerful at first. To make it simpler, Pilon suggests the next:
- Begin by fasting so long as you’ll be able to and steadily work towards the total 24 hours.
- Begin your quick whilst you’re busy and on a day the place you haven’t any social obligations that contain consuming.
- Drink loads of water
I sometimes don’t advocate Eat Cease Eat. The lengthy fasts are uncomfortable for most individuals, and plenty of discover they succumb to binge consuming after they’re lastly allowed to eat, which might stymie weight loss.
Like different protocols involving lengthy fasts, it additionally complicates coaching and high-protein weight-reduction plan, which might hinder muscle achieve.
Is Intermittent Fasting Higher for Weight Loss than Conventional Weight-reduction plan?
Research reveals that the majority intermittent fasting protocols successfully make it easier to lose fats, however this isn’t as a result of fasting is inherently particular for weight reduction.
When studies compare IF diets to common calorie-controlled diets, guaranteeing all of the dieters eat the identical variety of energy and mixture of macronutrients, folks sometimes lose the identical quantity of fats no matter their consuming schedule.
The true motive IF could be a helpful weight reduction device is that it helps some folks create a calorie deficit extra simply by limiting meals consumption to particular hours of the day or sure days of the week.
That mentioned, not everybody enjoys fasting, particularly over the long run. Studies present the extra you need to change about the way you eat—notably the way you like to eat—the extra dietary compliance suffers and the more severe your outcomes will probably be.
Furthermore, many individuals don’t take nicely to drastically lowering their meal frequency—they expertise uncomfortable ranges of starvation, irritability, and “mind fog.”
Research reveals that fasting can encourage overeating by rising the “reinforcing worth of meals,” too. Put otherwise, the extra you abstain from consuming (by fasting), the extra worth you’ll be able to place on having the ability to eat, and this will trigger you to eat greater than you’d in any other case.
Studies additionally present that fasting reduces the plasma ranges of the amino acid tryptophan, which your physique requires to provide serotonin (the “completely satisfied hormone”). As serotonin ranges fall, many undesirable signs can come up, together with despair, anxiousness, sexual dysfunction, hyperactivity, digestive difficulties, meals cravings, and extra.
Another excuse IF is probably not appropriate for everybody is that it could actually increase the chance of creating dysfunctional consuming habits, notably for these vulnerable to disordered consuming.
All that’s to say, intermittent fasting isn’t a magic bullet for weight reduction. It’s only a methodology of meal planning that may work nicely for individuals who want it over a standard consuming sample.
However you don’t have to quick to drop extra pounds. An everyday, calorie-controlled weight loss plan is simply as efficient and would possibly higher fit your preferences. For instance, most individuals who be a part of Legion’s body transformation coaching program select an everyday consuming schedule, and there’s no scarcity of “proof” it produces superb outcomes:
Is Intermittent Fasting More healthy Than Conventional Weight-reduction plan?
Most claims referring to improved well being whereas fasting deal with two factors: blood glucose (sugar) management and autophagy.
Let’s take a look at every individually.
Blood Sugar Management
Fasting followers argue that consuming a number of instances a day “spikes” blood sugar too steadily, rising ranges of irritation in your physique and desensitizing your cells to insulin. Over time, this will increase your odds of struggling well being points.
Their answer is to increase intervals of not consuming, thereby conserving blood sugar ranges decrease for longer.
Nonetheless, this reasoning is flawed.
Whereas consuming does increase inflammatory markers in your blood for a short time, these markers don’t keep elevated lengthy sufficient to trigger hurt.
A chic instance of this comes from a study revealed in 1975 within the Journal Archives of Inner Drugs during which researchers had overweight women and men eat in a big calorie deficit for greater than a 12 months, getting 90-to-95% of their every day energy from carbs (primarily white rice).
Regardless of the massive spikes in blood sugar, insulin, and inflammatory markers these dieters undoubtedly skilled after each meal, all of their well being metrics (ldl cholesterol, blood stress, fasting glucose ranges, and so forth) dramatically improved throughout the course of the examine.
In different phrases, the short-term spikes in inflammatory nasties didn’t hurt their long-term well being. Quite the opposite, their well being significantly improved as a result of they misplaced fats. And boy did they lose fats:
This examine underscores an important level: the general impact of weight loss plan on physique composition trumps the impression of non permanent blood sugar fluctuations. That’s, the top results of your weight loss plan (weight reduction) issues greater than the short-term results of particular person meals
Train is one other good instance of how short-term results don’t at all times predict long-term outcomes.
Whenever you raise weights, many measures of poor well being, together with elevated inflammation, heart rate, and blood pressure, quickly spike. But, individuals who exercise recurrently are normally more healthy and dwell longer than those that don’t.
Another excuse to doubt fasting zealots’ claims about blood sugar management is that though consuming fewer meals per day causes much less frequent spikes in blood sugar, fasters are likely to devour extra after they finally eat than individuals who have an everyday meal schedule.
The result’s that whereas fasters expertise fewer small, short-term blood sugar spikes per day, they trigger a lot bigger, longer-lasting spikes after they lastly eat. And that’s why research reveals that the general impression—the “space beneath the curve”—is comparable irrespective of the way you area out your meals, assuming you eat the identical variety of energy.
This isn’t to say that fasting can’t assist enhance blood sugar management—several studies show it could actually if it helps you drop extra pounds. However there’s no evidence fasting is superior to common calorie-controlled weight-reduction plan for this goal.
So, in case you’re weight-reduction plan to take management of your blood sugar, there’s no have to quick—observe whichever consuming sample makes reducing weight most simple.
Autophagy
The time period autophagy comes from the Greek for “self-eating” and refers back to the physique’s strategy of cleansing out broken cells and recycling their elements to maintain cells functioning correctly.
Consider it as a mobile housekeeping service, the place the physique clears away particles and repurposes damaged or pointless components to make sure every little thing runs easily.
Food regimen “gurus” usually declare that fasting uniquely triggers autophagy, which, they are saying, helps fight ageing and promotes longevity.
In actuality, autophagy increases everytime you’re in a calorie deficit. IF helps some folks keep a calorie deficit, so it could actually additionally successfully increase autophagy. However, there’s nothing particular about IF on this regard—sustaining a calorie deficit by any means may have the identical impact.
That’s, an everyday, calorie-controlled weight loss plan triggers autophagy simply in addition to IF.
Nonetheless, some IF fanatics declare there’s proof that fasting particularly will increase longevity.
Crucially, this evidence comes from rodent research. Whereas rodent research can generally present insights into human biology, they’re not notably helpful for finding out human longevity, primarily as a result of rodents have a lot shorter lifespans, so a 16-hour quick for them equates to weeks or months for people.
So, in case you’re fasting for its supposed longevity advantages, you could need to rethink. Dropping pounds and sustaining a wholesome physique composition—whether or not by means of IF or common calorie restriction—is the actual ticket to an extended, more healthy life.
(Oh, and there’s plenty of research displaying that train additionally will increase autophagy, so if you wish to increase longevity and also you’re not already lifting weights, it’s excessive time you began.)
Does Intermittent Fasting Trigger Muscle Loss & Hinder Muscle Development?
Two widespread issues about IF are that it causes muscle loss and hinders muscle growth.
The logic is easy: bizarre weight-reduction plan means that you can eat protein at common intervals, which retains muscle protein synthesis (MPS) charges elevated all through the day, theoretically conserving your “muscle-building equipment” firing.
In distinction, IF entails prolonged intervals with out meals, throughout which MPS charges decline.
Over time, this would possibly make it tougher to construct muscle and will result in muscle loss, or so the idea goes.
Analysis challenges this line of considering, although.
Two reviews evaluating numerous IF protocols discovered no vital distinction in muscle development or retention between IF and common weight-reduction plan when dieters consumed adequate protein. This implies that IF most likely doesn’t hinder muscle development or trigger muscle loss so long as you eat a high-protein diet.
One other noteworthy study revealed in Weight problems (Silver Spring) break up 18 obese or overweight males into two teams: a regular-diet group and an intermittent-fasting group.
Each teams maintained a calorie deficit, however the IF group ate inside an eight-hour window, whereas the regular-diet group had a 12-hour feeding window.
The outcomes confirmed that the IF group misplaced considerably extra muscle (~2.2 lb) in comparison with the regular-diet group (~0.4 lb).
This appears regarding, nevertheless it’s most likely much less of a problem than it seems for the reason that dieters neither lifted weights nor consumed satisfactory protein.
Thus, the actual takeaway is that IF can result in muscle loss in case you don’t handle it correctly. However given the opposite information we’ve seen, it’s most likely not a big challenge for individuals who mix IF with common strength training and a high-protein weight loss plan.
Many individuals consider that going too lengthy with out meals triggers “starvation mode,” a state during which your physique thinks it’s ravenous and quickly shops fats while you lastly eat.
This can be a fable.
In a single study, basal metabolic rate (BMR) didn’t decline till 60 hours of fasting, and the discount was simply 8%. In different phrases, in case your BMR is 1,800 energy, it might drop to round 1,650 energy when you forgo meals for two and a half days.
Different research reveals that the metabolism truly accelerates after 36-to-48 hours of fasting. Though this appears counterintuitive, it is sensible from an evolutionary perspective.
Should you haven’t eaten shortly, your physique desires you to seek out meals. To inspire you, it floods you with adrenaline and noradrenaline, sharpening your thoughts and, by the way, rising your metabolic fee.
The true “hunger mode” begins after about 72 hours of not consuming, when muscle becomes the physique’s major vitality supply. Even then, the physique takes measures to protect muscle due to its important function in keeping us robust, practical, and immune to illness.
So, don’t fear about fasting ruining your metabolism. No wise intermittent fasting protocol—like those we’ve mentioned—will hurt it.
+ Scientific References
- Surina, D. M., et al. “Meal Composition Affects Postprandial Fatty Acid Oxidation.” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 264, no. 6, 1 June 1993, pp. R1065–R1070, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.1993.264.6.r1065.
- Seimon, Radhika V., et al. “Do Intermittent Diets Provide Physiological Benefits over Continuous Diets for Weight Loss? A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 418, Dec. 2015, pp. 153–172, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2015.09.014.
- Maruthur, Nisa M, et al. “Effect of Isocaloric, Time-Restricted Eating on Body Weight in Adults with Obesity.” Annals of Internal Medicine, 19 Apr. 2024, https://doi.org/10.7326/m23-3132. Accessed 26 Apr. 2024.
- Templeman, Iain, et al. “A Randomized Controlled Trial to Isolate the Effects of Fasting and Energy Restriction on Weight Loss and Metabolic Health in Lean Adults.” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 13, no. 598, 16 June 2021, stm.sciencemag.org/content/13/598/eabd8034, https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abd8034.
- Thomas, Elizabeth A., et al. “Early Time‐Restricted Eating Compared with Daily Caloric Restriction: A Randomized Trial in Adults with Obesity.” Obesity, vol. 30, no. 5, 26 Apr. 2022, pp. 1027–1038, https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23420. Accessed 1 July 2022.
- Liu, Deying, et al. “Calorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss.” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 386, no. 16, 21 Apr. 2022, pp. 1495–1504, https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2114833.
- Varady, Krista A., et al. “Cardiometabolic Benefits of Intermittent Fasting.” Annual Review of Nutrition, vol. 41, no. 1, 11 Oct. 2021, pp. 333–361, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nutr-052020-041327.
- Cook, Florence , et al. Compliance of Participants Undergoing a “5-2” Intermittent Fasting Diet and Impact on Body Weight. 17 Aug. 2022, pp. P257-261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.08.012.
- Schübel, Ruth, et al. “Effects of Intermittent and Continuous Calorie Restriction on Body Weight and Metabolism over 50 Wk: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 108, no. 5, 1 Nov. 2018, pp. 933–945, academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/108/5/933/5201451, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqy196.
- Gibson, Alice, and Amanda Sainsbury. “Strategies to Improve Adherence to Dietary Weight Loss Interventions in Research and Real-World Settings.” Behavioral Sciences, vol. 7, no. 4, 11 July 2017, p. 44, www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/7/3/44, https://doi.org/10.3390/bs7030044.
- Epstein, Leonard H, et al. “Effects of Deprivation on Hedonics and Reinforcing Value of Food.” Physiology & Behavior, vol. 78, no. 2, Feb. 2003, pp. 221–227, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00978-2. Accessed 26 Aug. 2020.
- Cowen, P. J., et al. “Moderate Dieting Causes 5-HT 2C Receptor Supersensitivity.” Psychological Medicine, vol. 26, no. 6, Nov. 1996, pp. 1155–1159, https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329170003587x. Accessed 9 Nov. 2021.
- Stice, Eric, et al. “Fasting Increases Risk for Onset of Binge Eating and Bulimic Pathology: A 5-Year Prospective Study.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, vol. 117, no. 4, 2008, pp. 941–946, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2850570/, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013644.
- Gregersen, S., et al. “Inflammatory and Oxidative Stress Responses to High-Carbohydrate and High-Fat Meals in Healthy Humans.” Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 2012, 2012, pp. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/238056. Accessed 5 Apr. 2019.
- Erridge, Clett, et al. “A High-Fat Meal Induces Low-Grade Endotoxemia: Evidence of a Novel Mechanism of Postprandial Inflammation.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 86, no. 5, 1 Nov. 2007, pp. 1286–1292, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/86.5.1286. Accessed 23 Mar. 2020.
- Kempner, W., et al. “Treatment of Massive Obesity with Rice/Reduction Diet Program. An Analysis of 106 Patients with at Least a 45-Kg Weight Loss.” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 135, no. 12, 1 Dec. 1975, pp. 1575–1584, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1200726/.
- da Luz Scheffer, Débora, and Alexandra Latini. “Exercise-Induced Immune System Response: Anti-Inflammatory Status on Peripheral and Central Organs.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1866, no. 10, 29 Apr. 2020, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7188661/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2020.165823.
- Nystoriak, Matthew A., and Aruni Bhatnagar. “Cardiovascular Effects and Benefits of Exercise.” Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 5, no. 135, 28 Sept. 2018. National Library of Medicine, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172294/, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2018.00135.
- Carpio-Rivera, Elizabeth, et al. “Acute Effects of Exercise on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analytic Investigation.” Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, vol. 106, no. 5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160064.
- Zaman, Adnin, et al. “The Effects of Early Time Restricted Eating plus Daily Caloric Restriction Compared to Daily Caloric Restriction Alone on Continuous Glucose Levels.” Obesity Science & Practice, 4 Aug. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.702. Accessed 26 Feb. 2024.
- Corley, B. T., et al. “Intermittent Fasting in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Risk of Hypoglycaemia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 35, no. 5, 27 Feb. 2018, pp. 588–594, onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dme.13595, https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.13595.
- Harvie, Michelle, et al. “The Effect of Intermittent Energy and Carbohydrate Restriction v. Daily Energy Restriction on Weight Loss and Metabolic Disease Risk Markers in Overweight Women.” British Journal of Nutrition, vol. 110, no. 8, 16 Apr. 2013, pp. 1534–1547, www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-nutrition/article/effect-of-intermittent-energy-and-carbohydrate-restriction-v-daily-energy-restriction-on-weight-loss-and-metabolic-disease-risk-markers-in-overweight-women/BC03063A5D8E9446D5090DB083A4B226, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114513000792.
- Harvie, M N, et al. “The Effects of Intermittent or Continuous Energy Restriction on Weight Loss and Metabolic Disease Risk Markers: A Randomized Trial in Young Overweight Women.” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 35, no. 5, 5 Oct. 2010, pp. 714–727, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3017674/, https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2010.171.
- Carter, Sharayah, et al. “Effect of Intermittent Compared with Continuous Energy Restricted Diet on Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.” JAMA Network Open, vol. 1, no. 3, 20 July 2018, p. e180756, jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2688344, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0756.
- Carter, S., et al. “The Effects of Intermittent Compared to Continuous Energy Restriction on Glycaemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes; a Pragmatic Pilot Trial.” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 122, Dec. 2016, pp. 106–112, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2016.10.010.
- Carter, S., et al. “The Effect of Intermittent Compared with Continuous Energy Restriction on Glycaemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: 24-Month Follow-up of a Randomised Noninferiority Trial.” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 151, May 2019, pp. 11–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.022.
- Bergamini, Ettore, et al. “The Role of Autophagy in Aging: Its Essential Part in the Anti-Aging Mechanism of Caloric Restriction.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1114, 1 Oct. 2007, pp. 69–78, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17934054, https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1396.020. Accessed 30 Apr. 2020.
- Shabkhizan, Roya, et al. “The Beneficial and Adverse Effects of Autophagic Response to Caloric Restriction and Fasting.” Advances in Nutrition, vol. 14, no. 5, 30 July 2023, pp. 1211–1225, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10509423/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.07.006.
- Bagherniya, Mohammad, et al. “The Effect of Fasting or Calorie Restriction on Autophagy Induction: A Review of the Literature.” Ageing Research Reviews, vol. 47, Nov. 2018, pp. 183–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2018.08.004.
- Yang, Yi, and Lihui Zhang. “The Effects of Caloric Restriction and Its Mimetics in Alzheimer’s Disease through Autophagy Pathways.” Food & Function, vol. 11, no. 2, 2020, pp. 1211–1224, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9fo02611h. Accessed 11 May 2020.
- Pak, Heidi H., et al. “Fasting Drives the Metabolic, Molecular and Geroprotective Effects of a Calorie-Restricted Diet in Mice.” Nature Metabolism, vol. 3, no. 10, 1 Oct. 2021, pp. 1327–1341, www.nature.com/articles/s42255-021-00466-9#:~:text=Our%20results%20shed%20new%20light, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-021-00466-9. Accessed 6 Jan. 2022.
- J. Mitchell, Sarah , et al. Daily Fasting Improves Health and Survival in Male Mice Independent of Diet Composition and Calories. 18 Sept. 2018, pp. P221-228.E3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.011.
- Brandhorst, Sebastian , et al. A Periodic Diet That Mimics Fasting Promotes Multi-System Regeneration, Enhanced Cognitive Performance, and Healthspan. 18 June 2015, pp. P86-99, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2015.05.012.
- Botella, Javier, et al. “Exercise and Training Regulation of Autophagy Markers in Human and Rat Skeletal Muscle.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 23, no. 5, 27 Feb. 2022, p. 2619, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23052619. Accessed 7 Nov. 2022.
- Brandt, Nina, et al. “Exercise and Exercise Training‐Induced Increase in Autophagy Markers in Human Skeletal Muscle.” Physiological Reports, vol. 6, no. 7, 6 Apr. 2018, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5889490/, https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.13651. Accessed 31 May 2021.
- Escobar, Kurt A., et al. “Autophagy and Aging: Maintaining the Proteome through Exercise and Caloric Restriction.” Aging Cell, vol. 18, no. 1, 15 Nov. 2018, p. e12876, https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12876. Accessed 28 Feb. 2020.
- Conde-Pipó, Javier, et al. “Intermittent Fasting: Does It Affect Sports Performance? A Systematic Review.” Nutrients, vol. 16, no. 1, 4 Jan. 2024, pp. 168–168, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10780856/, https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16010168.
- Parr, Evelyn B, et al. “Eight‐Hour Time‐Restricted Eating Does Not Lower Daily Myofibrillar Protein Synthesis Rates: A Randomized Control Trial.” Obesity, vol. 31, no. S1, 22 Dec. 2022, pp. 116–126, https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23637. Accessed 30 Aug. 2023.
- Nair, K S, et al. “Leucine, Glucose, and Energy Metabolism after 3 Days of Fasting in Healthy Human Subjects.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 46, no. 4, 1 Oct. 1987, pp. 557–562, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3661473-leucine-glucose-and-energy-metabolism-after-3-days-of-fasting-in-healthy-human-subjects/, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/46.4.557. Accessed 22 Dec. 2019.
- Zauner, C, et al. “Resting Energy Expenditure in Short-Term Starvation Is Increased as a Result of an Increase in Serum Norepinephrine.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 71, no. 6, 2000, pp. 1511–5, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10837292, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1511.
- E Owen, Oliver , et al. Protein, Fat, and Carbohydrate Requirements during Starvation: Anaplerosis and Cataplerosis. July 1998, pp. P12-34, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/68.1.12.
- Lee, Christine G., et al. “Mortality Risk in Older Men Associated with Changes in Weight, Lean Mass, and Fat Mass.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 59, no. 2, Feb. 2011, pp. 233–240, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03245.x. Accessed 5 Mar. 2021.
